When this topic matters
The "quality or quantity" dilemma appears in every call center. Pressure for numbers vs pressure for quality. But framing them as opposites is a mistake.
If you manage a team or campaign and feel you have to choose, you need a different framework.
What happens in practice
Companies often swing pendulum-like: one month push for volume, then complaint about quality comes, then push for quality, then complaint about low performance comes.
Reality is that quality and volume are not on a scale. They are two independent axes. You can have high volume with high quality — if you have right inputs and processes.
Why it fails
It fails when you measure only one dimension. Only volume = quality drops. Only quality = output drops.
Also fails when expectations are not realistic. High quality on bad database is impossible. High volume without sufficient headcount too.
How to think about it
Set minimum for both dimensions: 1) Minimum activity (attempts, connections). 2) Minimum quality (scorecard, audit sampling).
Then optimize both simultaneously. If quality drops, look for cause (database, script, training) instead of reducing activity.
What you gain and what you lose
Correct setting of both dimensions gives stable, predictable results. But requires investment in quality measurement and feedback.
Ignoring one dimension gives short-term "better" numbers in the other, but long-term destroys the entire system.
When to apply
Always. Every campaign needs minimum activity and minimum quality. But settings differ by segment.
High-value segments: higher emphasis on quality. High-volume segments: higher emphasis on efficiency, but still with quality gate.
Quality and volume are not opposites — they are two dimensions that must be managed simultaneously. Set minimum for both and look for causes when one drops.