When this topic matters
ICP is the foundation of every outbound. Without it, you do not know who to call, what to say, or how to measure success.
The problem is that most ICP definitions are too abstract ("mid-size companies in IT") or too vague to be used in practice.
What happens in practice
Companies often define ICP marketing-style (persona), not sales-style (criteria). Result is description of "typical customer", but not a guide on how to find them.
Practical ICP definition must contain: segment (industry, company type), size (revenue, headcount), need signals (when it "hurts"), and exclusion criteria (who not to contact).
Why it fails
ICP fails when it is too broad (you contact everyone) or too narrow (you cannot find enough contacts).
Also fails when it is not validated — definition on paper does not match market reality.
How to think about it
Define ICP in three layers: 1) Firmographics (segment, size, geography). 2) Situational triggers (when they need solution). 3) Decision structure (who decides, how).
Then add anti-ICP: who you explicitly do not call (competition, sensitive segments, existing clients).
- Firmographics: industry, size, geography
- Triggers: hiring, funding, regulation, expansion
- Structure: roles, procurement, budget
- Anti-ICP: who not to contact
What you gain and what you lose
Clear ICP: better targeting, higher conversion, easier messaging. But requires effort for definition and validation.
Vague ICP: faster start, more contacts. But lower conversion and harder result evaluation.
When to apply
Always before launching outbound. And then regularly validate — ICP can change with product, market, or experiences.
Especially important during: entering new market, launching new product, strategy change.
ICP is not a persona, it is a filter. Define it so you can filter database, measure results, and iterate. Firmographics + triggers + structure + anti-ICP.